Person Over Position
Unpacking the Impacts of Experience-Sharing on Social Evaluations, Emotions, and Engagement in Opinionated Discourse
Research
This research examines how sharing personal experiences, rather than opinions, improves social discourse across ideological divides. Across three studies with nearly 2,000 American adults, we found that statements of experience (SoEs) significantly improved social evaluations of speakers compared to statements of opinion (SoOs), with listeners perceiving experience-sharers as more authentic, trustworthy, and emotionally resonant. We found that even when we disagree with another’s stance, hearing their personal experiences creates empathetic connections that bypass defensive reactions to opposing views. Our work challenges traditional deliberative models that emphasize rational debate as the primary pathway to mutual understanding, suggesting that to address increasing social polarization, we must instead create spaces where people can safely share and hear the lived experiences that shape their diverse perspectives.
More Research
New Social Forms
Exploring new rituals, formats, and structures for coming together
Pilots & Programs
Storyline
An auditable AI framework for tracing competing narratives across podcasts, conversations, and news
Research
AI-Assisted Conversation Highlighting
Discovering semantically or emotionally salient moments in spoken discourse using LLMs
Research
realtalk@Boston
A new civic infrastructure in Boston grounded in dialogue as a way to building “civic muscle” of democracy
Pilots & Programs
Anthology
An AI interface that turns raw conversation audio into interactive maps
Research
Agora
A training ground to practice consensus-finding with real human perspectives
Research
